Sponsored student seeks another job

I am a corporate sponsored student from Japan. My sponsor covers my tuition and I am obligated to work for the sponsor at least 5 years. Before leaving Japan, I met my HR manager and signed an informal contract that states my obligation last for 5 years unless I pay back all the cost to study here in the US.

I believe the contract is based on mutual agreement between the sponsor and myself, and it actually allows me to quit the current job as long as I can pay back all the cost.

Since we have a mutual agreement, is it still ethical for me to search for a new job?

I feel that this would fail the generalization test, because if everyone decided to seek a new job, then companies would stop sponsoring their employees to study abroad, and therefore I would not have opportunities to study abroad with sponsorship.

Contributed by HH.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.

Financial bailouts

Are financial bailouts ethical?

Contributed by TS.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.

Bribery in Africa

A couple of years ago, I decided to create a small business in Africa. I knew that it would be challenging, since the continent has a reputation of corruption, but I have strong moral values and I didn’t think it would be an issue. In fact, I planned on leading by example and hoped to instigate a good sense of ethic around me.

However, a few months after the beginning of the business activities, my partner and I received a call to meet with a member of the government. Unfortunately, the meeting had only one purpose: we were asked for a bribe. In that country specifically, it seemed that there was no way around it.  All companies, including the Fortune 500′s, were paying their “dues.”

What would you have done if you were in my place?

Contributed by MK.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.

Psychological egoism

In reality, when making an ethical decision, do people really apply the generalization, utilitarian, and virtue tests to help them finalize their decision? We all know what’s right and what’s wrong; however, when making a choice, don’t people normally think of the benefits they will get first? I feel religion should play an important part in keeping the society in order. If people believe doing something bad/unethical will result bad karma, will they still do it or avoid it?

Contributed by ST.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.

Auditor looks too closely?

Dilemma: At my first firm, I was assigned to a client as the associate auditor for their four companies. As I was reviewing the records of one of the companies, I noticed several discrepancies that were not covered by my specific audit tests. No single discrepancy was large enough to warrant a change in the audit procedures, but the nature of the entries made me uncomfortable. I thought the controller (head internal accountant) was either incompetent or she was being intentionally oblique.

I brought this to the attention of my direct supervisor and she advised me to ignore it because the variances were not individually significant. I was stubborn. I presented the situation to the audit partner and convinced him to let me test more of the company’s records. As it turned out, the controller was incompetent. The discrepancies were the result of her carelessness and lack of comprehension. There was no change to the financials, but she was fired because of my findings.

I was directly responsible for her losing her job and my findings did not change the audit. Should I have let it go and allowed her to keep her job?

Contributed by RC.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.

Bug in the software

After college, I went to work at an IT consulting company as a technical consultant/software developer. We did custom development for large corporations, writing software based on the customer’s requirements. In addition, our company also sold proprietary portal software to these customers. I was working on a project where we made updates to the portal software that we already sold to a customer and installed in their environment. Also, I had access to their environment and could make updates whenever needed.

One day, while working on a new feature for the customer, I found a bug that had been there ever since the software was first installed. Even though the customer wasn’t aware of the bug, I knew that this was a serious bug that may cause a significant impact in the future. I thought about going into the customer’s environment and making changes myself without notifying the customer. In doing so, the credibility and reputation of our software would remain high. On the other hand, if I tell the customer about the bug and how it’s been in their system for past 2 years, they would lose confidence in our software and, furthermore, in our company. I didn’t know what to do. To make the situation more complex, the portal software was written by the management and they were very proud of it. If I tell them about the bug and how it’s been there ever since the software was written 7-8 years ago at the time, and that this bug is present in other customers’ portal as well, it would really embarrass the management in front of fresh consultants like myself. My dilemma was that I could just keep quiet and fix the bug without letting anyone know.

At the end, I decided to tell my manager and just follow what he would say. He was honest and told me to the fix the bug and notify the customer, and that’s what I did.

Contributed by SB.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.

Good Samaritan risk

The number of elderly people has significantly increased in China, and as a result, more are injured or become ill on the street. In the past, people would usually offer assistance. Nowadays, chances are nobody will offer help.  Even when people do, bystanders warn them to be careful and think twice before getting involved. The reason is that the elderly often accuse the helper for causing the injury in the first place, to get monetary compensation. Nobody wants to do good and then end up in court, so the only natural choice is to protect oneself and offer no help. Is this ethical?

Contributed by Xiaoer.

To comment on this dilemma, leave a response.  For anonymity, omit your email address and website, and use a screen name.